Showing posts with label No'ach. Show all posts
Showing posts with label No'ach. Show all posts

Friday, October 16, 2015

Noach 5631 Second Ma'amar

אֵלֶּה תּוֹלְדֹת נֹחַ נֹחַ אִישׁ צַדִּיק .../These are the offspring of No’ach; No’ach was a righteous man …” (Breishis 6:9)  The strange construct of this first pasuk of our parsha requires an explanation.  Rashi cites the Midrash which explains that the offspring of the righteous are their good deeds.  What does this mean?  What are Chazal teaching us?  After all, not only the righteous perform mitzvos.  What is special about the mitzvos that the righteous perform and what does it mean when Chazal say that those mitzvos are their “offspring”?  
 
In order to understand this Midrash we need to understand that actions are imbued with meaning by the intent of the one who performs them.  Two people can fulfill the exact same mitzvah, perform the same action, and yet the results of their actions can differ.  Certainly every mitzvah, regardless of who performs it, has spiritual ramifications.  God structured the world so that effects in spiritual realms are dependent upon our physical actions in the material world.  A tzadik, though, can lay claim to the spiritual effects of his mitzvos.  They affect him directly.  The reason, the Sfas Emes explains, is that the tzadik identifies so strongly with the mitzvos he does.  The tzadik puts his life energy into the mitzvah that he performs.  In Iyov we find, “... וּמִבְּשָׂרִי אֶחֱזֶה אֱ-לוֹהַּ/… and from my flesh I will perceive God.”  (Iyov 19:26)  To the extent we put our life energy towards the fulfillment of a mitzvah, we perceive its effects. 

To the extent we do a mitzvah with all our strength and for the moment of the mitzvah, are totally dedicated to it, we will experience the spiritual effect of the mitzvah. 


The Sfas Emes, therefore, understands this first pasuk of the parsha literally.  Because No’ach united with his wife as a tzadik, for the purpose of fulfilling a mitzvah, the result of the union were offspring who were worthy as they reflected his intent.

Friday, October 04, 2013

No'ach 5631 Third ma'amar (first half)

Chazal[1] teach us that the generation of the Flood transgressed three sins, idolatry, illicit relations and thievery.  Surprisingly, of the three, the decree of the Flood was sealed because of thievery.[2]  Idolatry and illicit relations are two of the cardinal sins.  We are required to forfeit our lives rather than transgress them.[3]  Why was the decree of the Flood sealed specifically for thievery?  What is it about stealing that makes it even worse than idolatry and illicit relations?

The fundamental reason that a person can permit himself to steal is that he does not recognize the owner’s rights.  Chazal apply this concept to our relationship with God.  They teach us that a person who eats without first making a brachah is considered to have stolen from God.[4]  The reason is that he is not acknowledging God’s ownership of the bread he eats.

The Sfas Emes expands this concept and applies it to all of life.  He says that being in this world and benefiting from it while not recognizing that God is the force underlying everything constitutes theft.  For this reason the Chiddushei HaRim says that the Torah requires confession when a thief returns a stolen object, “וְהִתְוַדּוּ אֶת־חַטָאתָם אֲשֶׁר עָשׂוּ וְהֵשִׁיב אֶת־אֲשָׁמוֹ בְּרֹאשׁוֹ .../They will confess their sin that they committed and return the principal amount of his guilt …” (Bamidbar 5:7)  Confession is required when repenting from any sin.  Why does the Torah mention it specifically by repentance from the sin of theft?

The Chiddushei HaRim explains that confession here actually alludes to repentance for anything because every sin contains an aspect of theft.  At the moment of the sinful act, there is always a denial of God.  If the sinner recognized God before him, he would be unable to sin.  As the Sfas Emes teaches, not acknowledging that God is the motive power underlying our actions constitutes theft.

The generation of the Flood did more than simply steal from their fellow man.  They stole from God by not recognizing Him in the Creation.  The Sfas Emes teaches us that to the extent that we recognize God in the world, God is revealed in the world.  Because generation of the Flood did not recognize God in the world, there was no divine revelation.  Life is dependent upon divine revelation.  When there is no divine revelation, we learn from the generation of the Flood that life ends.  This is the meaning of the pasuk, “... קֵץ כָּל־בָּשָׂר בָּא לְפָנַי כִּי־מָלְאָה הָאָרֶץ חָמָס .../… The end of all flesh has come before Me, because the earth was filled with thievery …” (Breishis 6:13)  This is the exact opposite of the pasuk, “... מְלֹא כָל־הָאָרֶץ כְּבוֹדוֹ/… the world is filled with His glory.” (Yeshayah 6:3)  When we recognize God, the world is filled with His glory.  When we do not, it is the end of life.  This is the reason the decree of the Flood was sealed specifically because of thievery; thievery representing not acknowledging God in the Creation.

 The Zohar[5] states this concept as well.  The Zohar says that No’ach’s ark is a metaphor for the Shechinah.  “... וַיִּשְׂאוּ אֶת־הַתֵּבָה וַתָּרָם .../… They lifted the ark and it was raised …,” (Breishis 7:17) is an allusion to the Shechinah leaving the world.  The Zohar says that once the Shechinah is no longer with us, there is no one to watch over the world and judgment rules.  The Sfas Emes understands that the Shechinah leaving means that the source of life has left.

This understanding sheds light on an enigmatic Midrash[6] in this week’s parsha.  The Midrash cites a pasuk in Yechezkeil (7:11), “הֶחָמָס קָם לְמַטֵּה־רֶשַׁע לֹא מֵהֶם ... וְלֹא־נֹהַּ בָּהֶם/Violence has arisen and become a rod against evil; it is not from them … there is no sobbing for them.”  The prophet is referring to Nebuchadnezer.  He is telling us that even though Nebuchadnezer destroyed evil, it was only God’s help that enabled him to succeed.  In the words of the prophet, “… it is not from them …” 

The Midrash understands this pasuk homiletically as referring to the generation of the Floodהחמס/Thievery stood up before God like a rod and said that it is not of them and has no rest in them.  This last is a play on words, changing נֹהַּ/sob to נֹחַ/rest.

What does, “he has no rest in them” mean?  Elsewhere,[7] the Sfas Emes explains that on the first Shabbos, the culmination of the Creation resulted in a revelation of God.  Each part of the Creation was fulfilling its unique task such that the entire Creation acted as one harmonious system.  A system in which all the parts operate smoothly can be considered to be at rest because there is no noise in the system.  This is the reason that there is an elevation of the entire Creation towards God on Shabbos.  He is more revealed.  When “thievery” said that it has no rest in them, it means to say that the generation of the Flood was lacking a connection to God.  God was hidden because the generation did not acknowledge Him.  Because God was not revealed  there was no “rest” in the Creation.

This also explains another Midrash[8] which says that No’ach was not worthy of being saved.  He was only saved because Moshe Rabbeinu was to come from him.  This seems to fly in the face of the pesukim which state clearly that he was righteous.  However, according to the Sfas Emes, since No’ach was part of the generation that did not recognize God, there could be no rest for God in this generation, meaning that the generation was not connected to Him.  True, No’ach was righteous in his own right, but the generation had a fatal flaw.  It could not continue to exist.  No’ach’s saving grace was his progeny.




[1] Sanehdrin 57a, 108a
[2] Sanhedrin 108a
[3] Sanhedrin 74a
[4] Brachos 35b
[5] Zohar 1:68b
[6] Tanchuma No’ach 4
[8] Breishis R. 26:6

Thursday, October 22, 2009

No'ach 5631 Third Ma'amar (second half)


In the first half of this ma’amar, the Sfas Emes shows that the generation of the Flood was destroyed because the people of that generation benefited from the world without recognizing God in it.  The second half of the ma’amar contrasts this approach with the approach of the generation of the haflaga/dispersal – the generation that built the tower of Babel.
The generation that built the tower of Babel recognized God.  They clearly understood that everything that they had came from Him.  But this knowledge put them at His mercy.  They wanted freedom from God.  They also understood that God runs the world through a hierarchical system of spiritual “ministers”.  Every component of the physical universe has a spiritual “minister” or root through which that physical component is sustained.  The generation of the tower of Babel wanted to distance themselves from God and deal only with the components of the universe.  They felt this would give them the freedom to do as they pleased.
The recognition of the One God is a unifying force.  The generation of the haflaga was unified because of it.  Although the Torah calls the generation of the haflaga עַם אֶחָד/one nation (Breishis 11:6), the Chiddushei HaRim[1] says this is a reference to the nation of Israel.  How so?  The Sfas Emes explains that the nation of Israel is associated closely with worshipping the One God, the exact opposite of believing in many different forces that govern the world.  The belief in One God unifies us.  Idol worship separates people.
Chazal[2] teach us that a person who observes the Shabbos is forgiven even for idol worship.  The wording of Chazal implies that he worships idols even as he observes the Shabbos.  But how can this be?  They contradict each other.  Observing Shabbos is a testimony to a unifying force in the world.  Shabbos was the culmination of the Creation.  The Creation was seen as one unified system on Shabbos, created by One Creator.  Idol worship is the exact opposite.  It is a testimony to many forces and a disbelief in the unity of the Creation.  How, then, can Shabbos and idol worship exist in the same person at the same time?  The Sfas Emes answers that they cannot.  Since the two cannot exist simultaneously in the same person, it is obvious that he is not really an idol worshipper and he is accepted as one who believes in one God.  He is therefore “forgiven” for whatever infraction he transgressed.
Although the generation of the haflaga wanted their unity, they also wanted their freedom.  They wanted at the same time to be separated from God.  This is a contradiction and therefore their unity was taken from them.
We find this concept in the Zohar[3] on our parsha as well.  Rebbi Shimon bar Yochai explains the pasuk, “וְהַבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנֹתוֹ אֶבֶן־שְׁלֵמָה מַסָּע נִבְנָה וּמַקָּבוֹת וְהַגַּרְזֶן כָּל־כְּלִי בַרְזֶל לֹא־נִשְׁמַע בַּבַּיִת בְּהִבָּנֹתוֹ/When the Temple was being built, it was build of complete quarried stone; no hammers, chisels nor any iron utensils were heard in the Temple while it was being built.” 
Rebbi Shimon bar Yochai teaches that the tools used to build the Temple represent the lower spiritual forces that directly influence the physical world.  Their not being heard refers to their subordinating themselves to the Shechina through which they receive sustenance from the upper spiritual realms.  When they are not heard, then, there is unity in the world.  There cannot be unity in the physical world without a corresponding subordination to its ultimate Root, God Himself.


[1] Chiddushei HaRim on the Torah No’ach s.v. hein am
[2] Shabbos 118b
[3] Zohar 1:74a-b s.v. umakavos vehagarzen